I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Here’s proof (if you need more) that people want something for nothing
Let’s reconnect with each other, not fall into dystopian Metaverse
Watching kids on a Friday night reminds me of struggle to belong
Two sets of rules: One for the public and a very different set for police
French president wants to ban homework as unfair to poor kids
This is why people are confused about what anarchists really are
Tough problem: What does a free society do about unfit parents?
Police or storm troopers: What’s become of U.S. law enforcement?
If you beg someone to make you his priority, you hurt yourself