There’s something wrong with the “justice” system when a jury convicts a man of a crime, but sends a note to the judge saying, “We’ve all reached a verdict. To us we feel he has been wronged. Please consider that in his sentencing.”
In other words, the jury felt that the accused was actually the victim in the case, but they still did what the judge and prosecutor told them to do. That’s wrong. (They’ve probably never heard of jury nullification, because judges work pretty hard to make sure jurors aren’t aware of their real rights and responsibilities.)
A Texas jury convicted a man of resisting arrest after police mistook him for a burglar and broke into his home — and he tried to escape from them. Police say a neighbor reported — wrongly — seeing a black male kicking in a door to the house. For some odd reason, this Hispanic man apparently didn’t trust that police who had just broken into his own home had his best interests at heart.
The man’s attorney says his client has the mind of a child and also struggles with the English/Spanish language barrier, but I’d say the guy showed good judgement in resisting the people who were breaking in and trying to grab him, whether they were dressed in police costumes or not.
‘Post-racial’ America? We’re nowhere close to that — and may never be
Friday’s article will be delayed
At what point does a president become a dictator to be impeached?
For governance, ‘one size fits all’ is a bad idea — even if the ‘one size’ is your version of freedom
Are your daily decisions giving you the results you want out of life?
Time and attention are flawless guides to what a person values
Autumn scents send subtle signals every year that it’s time for change
The moon represents what I seek, but words are all I can offer now
What if writing from the ‘AI me’ sounds just like I’d written it?