The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

In defense of the legal right to anonymous speech, political lies
As you grow, learn to let go of things that no longer serve you
Money is a tool, and it’s useless without motivation and vision
Love & Hope — Episode 8:
We’re neither friends nor enemies, just strangers who share the past
Was I ‘fat’? ‘Lazy’? My father’s ugly words made me feel shame
Question the ‘experts’: They don’t know as much as they think
If you can’t change your life story, that narrative will become destiny