Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Maybe it wasn’t correct choice, but I’m not having surgery Friday
Cult’s targeting of family funeral points to folly of speaking for God
Liberty-minded people need to distance ourselves from crazy folks
From hole I’ve fallen into today, world is a very alienating place
This week marks 15 years for a website that has evolved wildly
Movie popcorn overpriced? Sue ’em; spoiled children want their way
If you believe watching porn won’t hurt anyone, you’re wrong
Are your daily decisions giving you the results you want out of life?