If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Our reactions to others’ suicides say something about how we view life
Science or bias? What if there’s no proof that eating fat will kill you?
I’ll make fun of your Super Bowl, but you can’t make fun of my Spock ears
Money can’t buy happiness, but poverty can make you miserable
Meet Charlotte, one of the important women in my life
Shock merger: Democrats, GOP to join in creating new ‘super party’
Humans are impatient, but changes in Alabama show speed of change
If I perform well enough for you, will you give me love, approval?
Nature struggles to keep alive