If there’s one thing that most conservatives and libertarians agree on, it’s about the gospel of privatization. Both groups agree that everyone is better off when governments contract with private companies to perform services.
If you look at the Reason Foundation’s website, you can find all about the glories of privatization and why it’s better than having government employees perform the work.
You’ll see praise of privatizing public works, garbage collection, lotteries and airport screening, among others. I’m sure the facts of the reports and studies are accurate as far as they go, but they’re missing the most basic point, as far as I’m concerned.
If I am forced by a city or state to fork over the money to pay for paving roads or collecting trash or maintaining public parks, how much does it matter to me whether the employees who do the work are government employees or on the payroll of a company that I’m required to support, whether I like the work or not?
I’ve been thinking about this because I’ve been noticing horribly incompetent companies I deal with lately. That’s made me wonder why I should prefer dealing with one of them — if I didn’t have any choice in the matter — rather than government employees. Why is an incompetent private company with a monopoly any better than an incompetent government?
Conflict pushes inner buttons to make me feel like child in trouble
Trendy ‘anti-racists’ don’t realize they’ve been conned by Marxists
Eviction moratorium is pure theft; it’s a sign of creeping socialism
What kind of hypocrite gives advice but won’t practice what he preaches?

What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?
If Ron Paul was ‘our last hope,’ what’s your backup plan now?
If terrorists ‘hate us for our freedom,’ U.S. politicians are their best allies