If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

A year later, my father’s death looms large, but I have no regrets
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
Sabans remind me that choice of partner can be a key to success
Pride can drive dumb behaviors, even if subject is just car lights
Baby girl murdered by own father is reminder to stay away from abusers
Time and attention are flawless guides to what a person values
Don’t believe the words they say: Politicians revert to their incentives
Ghost from my past haunts me, but leaves me without answers
Ethnic Indian wins Miss America? Who cares? Bigots seem upset