What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

The goals we chase can become chains that hold us in bondage
Colorado high school student quits choir over Islamic worship song
Please read this: If you love books and smart women, you might cry, too
Why Santorum is wrong: When God sees sinful world, that includes U.S.
Time and maturity have changed
Words of appreciation can have power to connect us and heal us
Unless you’re suicidal, an armed march on D.C. is a very bad idea
Dogs, cats and children remind me of all the joy in small things