Birmingham man offering $10,000
to whoever finds him a girlfriend

By David McElroy · July 5, 2015

There’s a Birmingham man who’s so desperate for a girlfriend that he’s willing to pay $10,000 to whoever introduces him to a woman he dates at least six months.

But it’s not me. Honest. But it does make me think about how my ad would read if I did the same thing.

Ren You moved to Birmingham last year when he took a job here at a private equity firm just after he finished grad school in Boston. He’s from the Washington, D.C., area, so he has no social connections in Birmingham, and he says he works long hours which leave him little time to search for a girlfriend.

So he’s put up a website outlining who he is and what he’s looking for. He’s accepting applications — and he promises to pay $10,000 to whoever finds the right woman for him.

I’ve playfully kicked this idea around before, but more as satire than as something serious. Years ago, my friend, Whitney, used to threaten to post up posters on her college campus to find a wife for me. She was going to set up www.MarryDavid.com and plaster the campus of Washington University in St. Louis until she found the right weird young woman for me. It was a running joke that she threatened to turn serious.

Whitney never did the flyer or the website. She got married and moved to California instead. But the idea of satirizing an online search for love never left me. As recently as a few months ago, I kicked around the idea with a friend of setting up such a site for April Fool’s Day.

But now that I’m looking at a site someone else has done, it makes me think seriously about what mine would say. Ren You’s requirements for a woman seem pretty generic to me. He wants someone who is:

— Intellectually curious (about the rules to a new board game, random stuff on Wikipedia, etc.)
— Finds it fun to think about ridiculous hypotheticals
— Physically active
— Thinks take-out and a movie sound like a good Saturday night
— Knows the difference between “Astronomy” and “Astrology”

If that’s all he requires, it seems as though she should be found in short order. My requirements would be a little more complex. How about this ad?

“WANTED — Seeking dysfunctional woman for relationship leading to marriage and children. Prefer tall, brilliant, blue-eyed creative genius with personality disorder and unresolved childhood. Deep angst about solving life’s big questions desirable. Bi-polar disorder optional. Hearing strange voices in head OK as long as they’re under control, at least most of the time. Body type unimportant. No smoking or drinking. Psychiatric drugs OK. Reply before midnight tonight for a free set of Ginsu knives to the first five applicants.”

No? Too honest?

Most people seem to be looking for fairly generic things, from my point of view. Or maybe it’s simply that I feel so far out of the mainstream that it feels almost impossible to find someone like what I want — much less someone who’s looking for what I offer. What makes me so difficult to match? Let’s take a look:

— To be happy with me, a woman has to be interested in spending an inordinate amount of time talking, thinking and then talking some more — about all sorts of esoteric ideas. She has to think weird ideas — and offbeat “what ifs?” — are much more worthy of attention than what’s on television or who’s dating whom in Hollywood.

— To match with me, a woman needs to be a Christian but be comfortable in a theological space that doesn’t fit any mainstream labels. I’m not a theological conservative anymore, but I also don’t fit with progressive/liberal Christians for the most part. I have more questions than answers, and I’m comfortable seeking answers and simply trusting my experiences with God to provide the answers I need. Most people aren’t comfortable living in that space of uncertainty. Most Christian women seem to prefer a husband who will say, “This is the way I see the truth about everything.” I used to think I had everything figured out, but I know now how much of my own ego or intellect was part of those answers. I need a woman who’s comfortable living with that theological uncertainty.

— I need a woman who can live with a man who’s full of artistic doubt and angst at times. I find that there are parts of the creative process when there’s a lot of discomfort — when there’s something important you can almost grasp, but it keeps dancing away. When I’m dealing with that, I’m on edge and preoccupied. A woman would have to understand that temperament and that process — and be comfortable accepting it and helping me survive it.

— To match me, a woman has to be a bizarre blend of personally conservative but intellectually and emotionally open-minded. I need someone who wants a family that has a conservative lifestyle but is completely open to new ideas and constant self-improvement.

— I have to have a woman who is just as committed to family — and having children — as I am, but who has horizons that go much broader than just the household. She’s someone who is incredibly capable and competent, but who chooses to make family first priority. And speaking of family, it has to be someone who’s comfortable with ideas such as unschooling, and she has to be someone who’s just as eager as I am to keep learning more and more about the healthiest ways to raise children.

— My match knows that everything in life is a tradeoff and she’s willing to make the same tradeoffs I’m willing to make — to prioritize love, understanding, family and happiness over money, success and prestige.

— She has to accept living with a word nerd who cares far too much about writing, grammar and speaking properly. (Is it just a coincidence that most of the women I’ve been attracted to over the last 15 years are from the West and Midwest?)

The list could go on, but you get the idea. This is why I don’t do such an ad. Almost nobody would read my requirements. Even fewer would care.

Even though I’m making light of Ren You’s search for a girlfriend in this way, I actually understand why he’s doing it. The search is difficult for everyone. The way we typically go about it is pretty terrible — as divorce statistics will testify — but it’s even tougher for those of us with very narrow requirements which don’t seem to overlap very well with the rest of the world.

If you know of a candidate in Birmingham for Ren You, send him a message. You might win $10,000.

And if you know of the right woman for me, let me know. I’ll send you $7.41 and some really cute cat pictures.

Update: By late August, Ren You’s website was no longer active. Does it mean he found a woman? We might never know.

Share on Social Networks

When I first heard about this, I thought it must be satire. When I discovered it was real, I was appalled, but I still thought it must be a one-time thing from some nutty activist. But it turns out it’s the latest bit of pandering to a bunch of far-left activists who believe that a man can become a woman if he decides to claim he’s a woman. As everybody knows, men have prostate glands. Women do not. Period. End of story. Men can get prostate cancer. Women cannot. But political activists are so eager to pretend that a man claiming to be a “trans woman” is really a woman that they are insisting that “women” be included in public health messages about the issue. This is nothing but political virtue-signaling. If you’re a man, you know which parts you have. You know that you ought to be screened. Nobody is made any safer by dragging far-left gender ideology into simple medical reality.

Every time someone tries to tighten requirements around the use of absentee ballots, I hear screams from Democrats and others on the political left that such efforts are nothing but “suppression of black voters.” These protests have never made sense to me, especially because it’s never been a secret that absentee ballot fraud goes on all the time in certain areas. (Everybody knew it when I worked in politics.) The people who engage in such fraud are rarely caught — often because the local political establishment approves of the crime — but a Democrat who won a primary election in Clay County, Alabama, last year has pleaded guilty to this sort of cheating. Terry Andrew Heflin was running for a place on the Clay County Commission. He was caught ordering seven absentee ballots in the names of various voters and sending them to his post office box — after which he used the ballots to vote absentee for himself seven time. Did he have other people cast additional fraudulent ballots? We’ll never know. But in a primary in which he was able to win with only 141 votes, it wouldn’t take many fraudulent votes to change the election. The next time you hear “civil rights activists” claim that it’s just “voter suppression” to hurt blacks which is at the root of efforts to stop this fraud, remember Terry Heflin. If you care about fair and honest elections, ballot security and voter identity should matter to you.

A state legislator in Maine has been stripped of the ability to speak in the state Legislature — and her votes are not being counted on legislative issues — all because she made a truthful social media post. Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn, Maine) opposes allowing boys to compete against girls’ teams in school athletics and she’s become known for making an issue of it. On Feb. 17, she posted on Facebook about a recent example that she found outrageous. She posted side-by-side photos of a boy named John who competed last year in a state track event and won fifth place against other boys two years ago — and a photo of the same boy (now called Katie) who won first place in the same event this year against girls. Whether you find this outrageous or not, Libby is clearly being honest and truthful about the objective facts of an issue of public importance. But the state Legislature censured her. Democrats decreed that she could not speak in the House and that her votes would not count on legislation — until she apologized for the outrage of telling the truth. She refused and her constituents have been unrepresented in the state House since then. The people who promote this ideology are out of touch with reality and won’t rest until they force the rest of us to join them in this delusion. But even if you agree with “trans” ideology, you should be appalled at this heavy-handed attack on political speech.

The late Steve Jobs was at the center of our culture’s transition from analog to digital. He co-founded Apple Computer. He led the team that revolutionized personal computing with the first Macintosh. As CEO of Apple, he led the development of the iPhone and later the iPad. You would think the children of such a man would be surrounded by technology. But Jobs and his wife Laureen didn’t let their children use iPads. Their home had few screens of any kind. Even though Jobs spent most of his time developing and selling Macs and iPhones and iPads, he was home with his wife and children for dinner when he was in town. The family ate together at a simple wooden table in their kitchen — and there were no digital devices or focus on popular culture. Instead, he’s said to have guided his family toward deep discussions of art, philosophy and education — with no iPads to be found. If the man who guided the development of such products chose a different path for his own children, does that suggest that his digital experience taught him that children need human connection, not screens? And does it suggest the possibility that we might be better off if we made the same choice for our families?

For four years, Donald Trump’s supporters screamed that everything that went wrong was the fault of Joe Biden. They were sometimes right and they were sometimes delusional. (Anybody who knows me understands that I can’t stand Biden any more than I can stand Trump, just for different reasons.) But for two months, Trump has rampaged through U.S. political life — vandalizing pretty much everything in sight — and the vast majority of his supporters are silent at best. Many watch as he blows up the world economy and they make excuses for him. They’re in absolute denial, even about things that Trump is doing very intentionally. Anybody who understands economics and history knows that tariffs are a terrible idea from a pragmatic point of view. Anybody who values individual freedom knows that tariffs are massive taxes on individuals — and they’re a tool of political control over the ability of people to trade freely. Trump is the antithesis of everything which political conservatives stood for just a few years ago. It’s far past time for people who claim to be conservatives to reclaim the principles and values which they used to claim — and stop this mad man before he can accelerate the day when we experience economic and social collapse. Open your eyes to reality and reject this lying narcissist.

Related Posts