I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
I need to communicate meaning, but my words vanish into a void
Nightmarish dreams mean dead can continue to play mind games
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Anne, the cat who’d love to live in a shoe
The drama of a world gone mad leaves me longing for real peace
To think clearly, turn off the tube: Your television is not your friend
We’re happier if we learn to ‘sell’ ourselves to people who want us

For all my life, I’ve hidden anger in order to be ‘perfect’ to others
Could we solve tough problems if we didn’t know they’re difficult?