The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Being hermit looks good as world tries to make me a misanthrope
‘Winner-take-all’ culture fuels hatred in debate about our future
I used to ponder who I really am; today I just ask who I am for now
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Not voting makes a statement: ‘You don’t have my moral consent’
Looking for the Boston scapegoat? You’ll never find perfect security
We’re slowly losing our religion, but we manage to find new gods