The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Beauty queen’s suicide leaves me pondering lesson of Richard Cory
As a child, I was a capable liar, because I mimicked a narcissist
If parents excuse cheating, what should we expect from their kids?
HUMOR: The senator chooses between heaven and hell
Finding joy brings more happiness than the empty pursuit of pleasure
Does your life feel wasted so far? Maybe your best is yet to come
Food addiction means you’re missing something important that you need
After last month’s weight freakout, something’s shifted in my attitude
We’re often oblivious to what matters in life until it’s too late