I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Family seemed perfectly typical, but I felt envious of their lives
Is anyone surprised at gridlock of congressional ‘super committee’?
Best way to fight terror? Turn off your TV and get back to real life
Gingrich threatens to skip debates if he can’t dictate audience rules
Path to loving a woman always starts with intimidation for me
Door in my dream keeps trying to take me to the life I’ve needed
If parents excuse cheating, what should we expect from their kids?
Corruption trial prosecutor wrong: Power is for sale to highest bidder
Black ex-congressman speaks truth about racial ‘groupthink’ on voter ID