The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

They won’t listen to arguments; they might listen to honest art
Few things scare humans like the prospect of living, dying alone
Old documents force me to rethink things I’ve believed about my father
A tax on folks who can’t do math? Winning may be worst possibility
Town’s new fine for public profanity points to problem of ‘public’ spaces
I want my children surrounded by tools of creation, not consumption
How do you suppose invention of ‘truth machine’ would affect you?
As world spirals toward chaos,
FRIDAY FUNNIES