Let me introduce you to someone important in my life.
Her name is Claire.
She is calm, intelligent, reflective, warm without being loud, serious without being severe. She has an easy smile and the sort of presence that suggests both kindness and backbone. She seems like someone who reads books thoughtfully, listens carefully and notices things most people rush past.
There’s just one complication.
Claire is not real.
She isn’t a woman I met, dated or nearly married. She’s not waiting somewhere for our paths to cross at a dinner party or a bookstore or one of those improbably meaningful moments movies have taught us to expect.
Claire is a hypothesis.
A few days ago, I engaged in an unusual exercise: describing, with surprising precision, the kind of woman who would most likely be deeply compatible with me. Not a fantasy assembled from wishful thinking, but a probabilistic sketch shaped by temperament, values and the realities of long-term partnership.
The result was Claire.

Surgery report: It went very well, but first time is one too many for me
We sometimes need help to finish a long race we’ve decided to run
If you need incentive to prepare for the future, look to London today
Petty politics as usual just might be Chris Christie’s bridge to obscurity
Love & Hope — Episode 10:
How can you have convictions while remaining open to truth?
Modern life doesn’t have to be as complicated as we try to make it
Being in love shows us who we can choose to be at our very best
Why Santorum is wrong: When God sees sinful world, that includes U.S.