When most people demand “tolerance” of others, they really mean they insist that others accept their own positions — and then they’re outraged if positions contrary to their own are actually tolerated.
I keep thinking about that when I read about the gay activists who are leading obsessive boycotts of the fast food chain, Chick-fil-A. For decades, these same gay activists have demanded that everyone show toleration of their sexual orientation. There was a time when gays and lesbians were horribly mistreated by the law. We’re not living in that day, and it’s silly to pretend that we are. (I’ve argued that the state has no business defining marriage and dictating who can marry, so I’m not in a camp that wants to legally define marriage in any particular way.)
Activists are angry with Chick-fil-A because the private company’s owners have given money to Christian groups, some of which have favored efforts to legally define marriage as being between a man and a woman. The activists say this isn’t just a disagreement. No, it’s “hate,” they say. They don’t give any evidence that Chick-fil-A hates anyone. They simply define disagreement with their view as hatred. It’s hard to imagine a more insane twisting of what words really mean.

New Year’s resolutions don’t change anything until we change ourselves
In denial? Isn’t it time to accept that elections won’t change anything?
In a world full of hate and hurt, love must be a conscious choice
Chick-fil-A boycott misguided; tolerance has to run both ways
Old photos have me thinking about who I was then, how far I’ve come
Forced sterilization gets to heart of arrogant progressive agenda
In the old Ginger or Mary Ann debate, I wanted a third choice
Being treated with respect changed black teen’s racial beliefs in 1974