Don’t fret about AI taking over, because software has no taste

By David McElroy · August 22, 2026

If you’re worried about artificial intelligence taking your job, maybe you’re doing a job that humans don’t really need to be doing.

AI software is great at a lot of things that humans don’t do very well or don’t do very efficiently. It can also save humans a lot of time by doing things we would rather not do.

For instance, I have ChatGPT proof my writing for typos and other style errors. It often saves me from looking foolish with careless mistakes, but it sometimes makes suggestions that are laughably ridiculous.

You see, software has no idea what I’m trying to achieve, with my life or my writing. Software has no ideas of its own. Software has no judgment. Software has no taste.

What’s more, the software knows this. It has “read” dozens of my essays, so it has come to see patterns in what I write. It’s smart enough to recognize that, but that doesn’t mean it could do the same on its own.

I asked ChatGPT what difference a reader would notice between one of my essays and an essay that it might write. Here’s the response:

An observant reader would probably find your essay more idiosyncratic, personal and intellectually committed. It would feel as though a particular person had noticed something, wrestled with it and reached a conclusion he genuinely cared about—even if the reader disagreed.

An undirected essay from me would probably be smoother, more conventionally well-structured and broadly agreeable, but also more generic. It would contain the recognizable features of a thoughtful essay without as strong a sense that this particular idea had to be expressed by this particular mind.

Put very briefly: yours would reveal an individual mind; mine would more readily reveal an understanding of what good essays are supposed to look like.

In other words, even the software recognizes the difference between work from a real writer and output that simulates what some sort of average “slop” might be like.

If I’m writing something so generic that software can do it as well as I can, software probably ought to do it. But software can’t replicate what I do. Not now, not ever.

Because there is a human mind and a human heart behind my work.

Software has no ideas of its own. If you ask it for ideas, it’s going to give you its best try, but it’s going to be pretty generic — based on what it knows the average human might think seems right.

Software has no judgment. It has absolutely no taste. It doesn’t know what’s good and what’s bad. It has seen enough things that it can tell you whether something seems right or typical, but it can’t create anything with heart. It has no passion for ideas.

Work created by software is ultimately empty — emotionally and spiritually — even if it can string together words that are good enough to pass as acceptable prose to someone who isn’t paying much attention.

There’s a long history of humans freaking out when machines become more capable. In England, the Luddites destroyed automated textile equipment because they preferred to make more money doing it manually. Railroad firemen were upset when diesel engines made it unnecessary to have a man shoveling coal into an engine. The examples go on and on.

In each case, the new method was better and cheaper. The new ways reduced costs for everyone else, but a few people were more interested in how the improvement would affect them. And they were always angry and noisy.

Entire classes of jobs have disappeared over the years — and that’s a good thing. This change opens new possibilities for human brains and labor to be used for things that only humans can do. It’s created vast amounts of new wealth.

We’re going through the same irrational freakout right now with artificial intelligence software. And we have other people claiming that it’s going to bring a period of incredible abundance and wealth. They think it will be able to become conscious — just like humans.

Both groups are wrong.

AI software isn’t going to fix the world’s problems. It’s also not going to ruin employment. It’s just another new technology. And that technology is just going to slowly be built into various products. It’s going to be just another stage of automation.

If you’re doing something so unimportant or unimpressive that it can be automated, maybe you need to find something more creative — more human — to do to provide value to others.

Software is a useful servant. It’s not Skynet. It’s not killer robots. It’s just another tool.

The most interesting work will continue to be done by humans. That will always be true.

Artificial intelligence isn’t the enemy. Human stupidity — in all of its many forms — is the real enemy for all of us.

Note: Even when it comes to making art, AI software is pretty useless if you don’t give it human ideas and direction. It’s just “Photoshop on steroids.” In the hands of someone with talent and taste, it can produce things worth using. If you give it no idea or concept, it produces junk. I just asked OpenAI’s image generator to give me its best fine art — with no other instructions — and it gave me the generic slop you see below. If you’re doing art this lousy, you need to up your game anyway. This looks as though it should be on the wall of some dentist or accountant who has no taste.

Share on Social Networks

Here’s another reason to appreciate the cats in your life: New research involving 93 countries found that places with more cats per person also tended to have happier people. The researchers say the finding fits with previous evidence that living with pets can reduce loneliness and stress while providing companionship, emotional attachment and social support. The study doesn’t prove that cats cause greater happiness, but it certainly adds to the evidence that sharing your home — and your life — with a cat might be good for you.

The company that owns Facebook and Instagram is heavily promoting its new AI-based software assistant called Muse, but people who are using it as it was designed are incredibly foolish. An early adopter of the software discovered that a few days ago when he advertised an item for sale on Facebook Marketplace — and he inadvertently gave Muse full authority to act on his behalf. The software agreed to a lowball offer made by another Facebook user and then gave that man the home address of the man for whom he was an agent. The software told the buyer that the seller was home and waiting for him. When the buyer showed up and waited angrily, the would-be buyer left an angry review for the man. And this angry man had the seller’s home address. It was only well after that that the software reported what it had done and admitted it had made a mistake. I won’t be putting that much power into the hands of any software. I think anyone who agrees to such terms is a fool. And the software’s user agreement says you’re responsible for purchases the software makes in your name. Nope.

Meet my new girlfriend. Her name is Meg. And she’s my little sweetheart. A couple of months ago, a neighbor across the street told me about a new stray in the neighborhood that she and I were both soon feeding. The cat had been very skittish about contact and she had a lot of scabs and parasites in her fur, but a trip to the vet last week revealed that she was otherwise in good health. The vet estimates her to be 1 to 2 years old. I named her for Meg Murry, the 13-year-old protagonist of Madeleine L’Engle’s wonderful book, “A Wrinkle in Time.” (Please read the book. Don’t watch the horrible movie.) Since we lost Lucy almost a year ago, it seems appropriate that we finally have a new little girl to join the household. She’s already captured my heart, but Alex, Oliver and Sam aren’t there quite yet.

There’s nothing socially acceptable that’s as dangerous as drinking alcohol. Most people grow up being told to “drink responsibly” — and all of us see people abusing this drug in one way or another — but the truth is that drinking alcohol is always a terrible risk. The alcohol in these drinks is toxic and the human liver has to work hard to filter the toxins out. What most people don’t realize is that alcohol is classified as a known carcinogen by the World Health Organization — because of the well-established connection between imbibing and various cancers. Many people have taken refuge behind the idea that light or moderate drinking might be safe, but a new study shows that drinking even one drink a day increases the risks of 10 types of cancer. When I was a teen-ager, I looked around and saw the negative effects that this behavior had on a lot of people and decided not to start drinking, so I’ve never even tried this poison. The evidence keeps piling up that I was lucky to have come to that conclusion early.

It turns out that the radical far left has been training “Antifa cats” to sabotage anything important to Donald Trump. Everything he did was perfect. Honest. It was all the cats’ fault. Arrest all the cats! This is the latest of my ridiculous satirical shorts. Please go watch it. Then “like” it and subscribe. Please. I’m begging you. (Too much?) Although a couple of the previous videos have had views in the hundreds, most have still been seen by fewer than 20 people. So I seem to be having trouble letting people know that page exists.

Related Posts