We’ve seen beyond a shadow of doubt that the Occupy Wall Street protesters don’t understand economics and don’t understand the source of our financial problems. Until now, though, I could say, “But at least they all understand bailing out the banks was a bad idea.” Unfortunately, even that was too charitable.
The first professional survey data about the protesters is out, and the information is pretty interesting. The thing that really jumped out at me, though, was the news that half of the protesters believe the big bank bailouts were necessary.
So let’s try to wrap our heads around this. They are angry that the banks got our money, so they’re protesting there. But a full half of the protesters believe it was necessary for the government to give billions and billions of dollars to the banks. How do their heads not explode from holding this contradiction inside?
Do these people not understand that businesses which take unwise chances and lose deserve to go out of business? Do they not understand that what economist Joseph Schumpeter called “creative destruction” is necessary for the market to work?
The survey from which this information comes was done by long-time Democratic Party pollster Douglas Schoen. Anyone who’s under the illusion that these are just frustrated mainstream types hurting from the bad economy needs to listen to what Schoen writes about them:
Why are killing, maiming people elsewhere called moral, ‘legal’?
It’s hard to ‘get over it’ if pain of abuse turns to rage against self
I haven’t learned to stop walking on eggshells around angry people
What is your measure of success? For me, meaning keeps changing
Teacher suspended for insisting that failure is an option for lazy kids
Sorry, Hillary: Research shows it doesn’t take a village to raise a kid
Star Trek film is reminder that adults no longer run Hollywood
Until you ask the right questions, you’ll never find missing answers
If you ask wrong questions about politics, you’ll get wrong answers