I’ve been falling in love with the same woman my entire life.
She’s had different names over the years. She’s had different faces. There have even been very real differences between her incarnations. But at the core, she’s always been my latest and most mature understanding of “the Ideal Woman.”
The ideal woman doesn’t exist any more than the ideal man exists. I know that. But it’s the best phrase I have for this abstract idea. I don’t know where I’m going with this, but it’s constantly been on my mind for the last week. I need to talk about it. Maybe I’ll have a point. Maybe not.
Think about a product that goes through generations of change over years, but it’s still recognizable as the same product each time. If you compare the first iPhone from 2007 with the current model, it would seem radically different. But if you compared the first iPhone to the second, then the second to the third — and so on, including last year’s model to this year’s — you recognize the same idea and same product. But the latest is radically different from the very first.
If you compared my first Ideal Woman with my most recent, you would see differences, but the core elements — the ideal parts in each of them — are startlingly similar.

Voting Rights Act oversight rules should reflect today, not the past
I haven’t learned to stop walking on eggshells around angry people
Both sides of gun debate see what they want to see in D.C. shooting
Goodbye, William (1999-2015)
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Feds to trucking co.: You can’t fire the drunk, but you’re liable for him
Brutal truth is that we will never be able to fix all of world’s evils
GOP hypocrisy: It’s only ‘pork’ when federal spending is in other districts