I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Modern obsession with ‘hot girls’ teaches everybody to be shallow
It’s great to visit Memory Lane, but it’s fatal to try to live there
Is it persistence or stubbornness to keep chasing uncertain outcomes?
Ordinary miracles fill our lives, while we still demand wonders
Deconstructing my old life’s hard, but I’m learning to be healthier
When intense feelings turn numb, something inside has died for me
Each experience of beauty and love stands alone, different from the rest
Keep trying: The squirrels are pedaling as hard as they can
Are government employee unions making the rest of us unsafe?