In the last 48 hours, Paul Ryan has been crowned the great hope of fiscal conservatives. If they honestly believe that, they’re more desperate than I thought, because the only way to see Ryan as fiscally conservative is to completely ignore his record.
It seems that the presumptive GOP vice presidential nominee is seen as a fiscal conservative simply because of his budget proposal in the House. His proposal would have balanced the budget without raising taxes, but it was an absolute fairy tale of a proposal, partly because it would have required decades of future presidents and Congresses to stick to it as laid out. Is there anybody in the world stupid enough to believe that’s even remotely possible?
Mainstream political reporters are painting the selection of Ryan as a turn to the “radical right” to placate the Tea Party’s supporters. A writer for Time magazine even said that Ryan was the choice of the “libertarians on the Wall Street Journal editorial board….” (I haven’t run into any actual libertarians yet who are excited about Ryan.)

Vile human cost of war ignored by Americans playing political games
Why do tax dollars fund lavish lifestyles for bureaucrats?
I don’t really hate you, honest; I’m just afraid you may hurt me
Here’s why I won’t be watching the presidential candidates ‘debate’
Unexpected meeting forces me to believe I might fall in love again
In praise of the weirdos who most people don’t really seem to like
In a relationship, some words more important than ‘I love you’
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Even when we’re right, criticism stems from our own insecurities