The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

More dependence ahead now that half of households get U.S. checks
Despite promise of new tech, today’s journalism is just trivia
Looking for a good read? Check out my book recommendations
Roy Moore just the latest in the long line of politicians who want control
Narcissists set themselves up for miserable lives and lonely deaths
The Alien Observer:
No loneliness worse than being with others, but not the right one
Social media creates shallow ties at expense of deeper connections