There’s a new royal baby. Have you heard? (It’s a prince, by the way.) Your reaction to this news probably puts you into one of two camps.
Those in one camp find it strangely fascinating and they’re eager to hear more about it. Those in the other camp not only couldn’t care less, but are actively irritated by the event being treated as noteworthy. Count me among the second group.
It’s easy to make fun of interest in the royal family. I’ve done my share of it in the past and I’ve been seeing a lot of it again lately because of the birth of this child. But something hit me Monday that’s making me think about it in a new way. I’m not certain I’m right, but I suspect there’s truth to it.
Lurking inside almost everyone is a desire for someone to tell us what to do and take care of us. Consciously or not, most people have a deep need for someone to be “in charge.” I suspect that interest in royalty of any kind is a remnant of a desire that’s played itself out for hundreds or thousands of generations of our ancestors.

Assassin or patsy? How can you trust any of the players in this case?
Overthrow of Gaddafi no justification for attacks on other countries
She says she’ll always love me, but she didn’t say who she was
Noise of culture isn’t evil, but it drowns out what really matters
Emotional toll from surgery harder than physical recovery
If you vote, you’re my real enemy — no matter who gets your vote
What do U.S. colleges sell today? Knowledge or just access to jobs?
When the night is dark and quiet, my open heart expects a miracle
Thugs attacking private property aren’t anarchists; they’re vandals