When most people demand “tolerance” of others, they really mean they insist that others accept their own positions — and then they’re outraged if positions contrary to their own are actually tolerated.
I keep thinking about that when I read about the gay activists who are leading obsessive boycotts of the fast food chain, Chick-fil-A. For decades, these same gay activists have demanded that everyone show toleration of their sexual orientation. There was a time when gays and lesbians were horribly mistreated by the law. We’re not living in that day, and it’s silly to pretend that we are. (I’ve argued that the state has no business defining marriage and dictating who can marry, so I’m not in a camp that wants to legally define marriage in any particular way.)
Activists are angry with Chick-fil-A because the private company’s owners have given money to Christian groups, some of which have favored efforts to legally define marriage as being between a man and a woman. The activists say this isn’t just a disagreement. No, it’s “hate,” they say. They don’t give any evidence that Chick-fil-A hates anyone. They simply define disagreement with their view as hatred. It’s hard to imagine a more insane twisting of what words really mean.

If the state didn’t wither away for Marx and Engels, is there really a post-statist era ahead now?
Your words of kindness can show love to strangers struggling in life
NOTEBOOK: The forest is burning, so quit arguing about single trees
You always need enough money that you can quit when it’s time
Correcting an old error: there’s no such thing as ‘We the People’
‘Thanks for sharing your process’ is wiser than responding in anger
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Sam, the baby kitten I stole