The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

God watches humanity’s struggle and says, ‘You’re doing it wrong’
Memo to politicians: Coercion isn’t the same thing as ‘investment’
Step in the right direction: U.S. ad group bans cosmetic photoshopping
If our assumptions don’t match, we can clash with best intentions
What are you likely to regret when it’s too late to change?
If abortion is just simple choice, why is killing babies for gender bad?
Boston ‘gay on gay’ assault shines light on absurdity of ‘hate crime’