I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

To think clearly, turn off the tube: Your television is not your friend
What would I do with my time if the money made no difference?
I’ve lost all interest in begging anyone to fix the political system
AUDIO: We lose the love we need by letting imperfections scare us
Lack of ability to think plays a role in public acceptance of higher taxes
Odd interest in UK’s royal family suggests remnant of need for ruler
A month after my father’s death, it doesn’t feel real that he’s gone
If you live by your principles, others won’t control your actions