If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade later this year, I don’t plan to talk about it publicly.
That doesn’t mean I won’t have thoughts about it. That just means there will be nothing useful for me to say. If you thought the country was divided by opinions about Donald Trump or George Floyd, wait until you see this.
If you think social media is polarizing now, just wait until what such a decision will bring. And I have nothing to say that would make any of the extremists — on any side — happy. In fact, I can’t imagine an opinion such as mine being read at that time. So if that happens, I won’t be talking about it.
Why?
Because either extreme on the issue brings about an end result which I believe is morally wrong and is socially destructive. But in this social and political environment, you are required to be on one side or the other — in the extreme — without fail. If you express concerns about what either result will bring us, you will be shouted down as a heretic.

Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?
She’s miserable in life she chose, but she’s too proud to change now
What if a key to knowing what to do is built into everybody’s gut?
For good or bad, we default back to what feels most familiar to us
Outer storms will end, but storms in my heart do lasting damage
I’m still hungry for healthy love that my 5-year-old self craved
Inner alarm is louder every day; big changes must come to my life
Teacher suspended for insisting that failure is an option for lazy kids