Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

FRIDAY FUNNIES
This mortal life swings between lonely misery and loving paradise
For some of us, loss of trust is a deep existential threat to heart
Why is it so hard to make good art? It’s something I’ll never understand
Love & Hope — Episode 10:
I’m terribly sorry to break it to you, but straw polls mean nothing
Why are churches only talking about freedom as it relates to abortion?
What if our craving for dopamine drives our desires and addictions?