Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

To heal from narcissistic abuse, you have to stop hurting yourself
We’re great at making big plans, but God laughs at our intentions
If you start at love, it’s easier to get to hate than to indifference
500 years after Luther’s 95 theses, there’s still not much to celebrate
We hate ourselves for needing other people’s approval so much
You finally have to stop making excuses for people who hurt you
Despite intentions, ‘net neutrality’ gives online control to politicians
Without real human connection, we’re just living in a simulation
My friends stepped up in a big way when I needed their help for Bessie