I have a certain old friend who’s very bright and thoughtful. He’s a respected attorney with a responsible government legal job. I have a lot of respect for his intelligence and his intellectual honesty, but our ideas about politics and society are strongly opposed.
When I wrote Sunday about the idea that taxation is theft, he strongly disagreed, arguing that the idea was impractical and “naively idealistic.” He referred to what I said as an “untennable radical position.” I don’t want to re-argue that debate here. Instead, I want to look at other radical positions that seemed pretty untenable when they were first proposed.
Hundreds of years ago, it was taken for granted that kings had special rights that ordinary people didn’t have. He was seen as having his power from God and any opposition to the king was opposition to God. It was called the “divine right of kings.” The king had rights that made him little short of being a god in his kingdom. No one was allowed to judge or oppose the king except for God Himself.
Major parties compete to see who can tell the biggest lie about jobs
If there are exceptions to free speech, it’s not really free speech, is it?
If you aren’t free to to be a bigot if you choose, you’re not really free
Life choices: What’s important enough to spend your life doing?
Narcissists use ‘flying monkeys’ to keep victimizing their victims
Christmas stands for quiet truths: love, faith, community and family

Pursuing conscious life is harder than sleepwalking through a life
Will you uncover your blind spots? Or will you ignore red flags again?
Love & Hope — Update: