We’re frequently told that we must support foreign invasions and military operations in other countries because that means “supporting the troops.” A veteran of the military gave me his thoughts on this whole idea on Memorial Day.
Those who support invading other countries and continuing wars that can’t be won tell us that doing so honors and supports the men and women who are fighting the wars. If that’s true, why did 87 percent of contributions from active-duty U.S. military people to GOP candidates go to Ron Paul — the only candidate who supports an end to military adventurism, reserving the U.S. military to the role of defending this country rather than invading other countries that haven’t attacked us?
More of those in the armed services have grave reservations about the way the military is used today. Some might be blindly supportive of the militaristic view of their civilian bosses, but a substantial number know better. And as many of them finish their time in the military and reflect on what they’ve seen and heard, they come to view things in very different ways. This is what a veteran said to me Monday in discussing the illustration above:

Identity politics is the cancer behind Elizabeth Warren’s lie about ancestry
Calm and perspective needed for Boston, not accusations and games
‘War is the health of the state’ — but the death of the people who serve it
Though it’s helpful to have talent, that won’t guarantee success
World has become a freak show, but we’re not supposed to notice
Accepting joy tomorrow does no good if tomorrow never comes
What do you do when it feels as though your entire world is over?
For governance, ‘one size fits all’ is a bad idea — even if the ‘one size’ is your version of freedom
I’m shutting the whole world out, but I’m also waiting to be rescued