If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade later this year, I don’t plan to talk about it publicly.
That doesn’t mean I won’t have thoughts about it. That just means there will be nothing useful for me to say. If you thought the country was divided by opinions about Donald Trump or George Floyd, wait until you see this.
If you think social media is polarizing now, just wait until what such a decision will bring. And I have nothing to say that would make any of the extremists — on any side — happy. In fact, I can’t imagine an opinion such as mine being read at that time. So if that happens, I won’t be talking about it.
Why?
Because either extreme on the issue brings about an end result which I believe is morally wrong and is socially destructive. But in this social and political environment, you are required to be on one side or the other — in the extreme — without fail. If you express concerns about what either result will bring us, you will be shouted down as a heretic.

Social media can be dangerous for those of us raised by narcissists
FRIDAY FUNNIES
NOTEBOOK: Are Romney, Obama running for president or king?
If the state didn’t wither away for Marx and Engels, is there really a post-statist era ahead now?
If you have a good enough reason, you’ll leave your addiction behind
Facebook leads to marriage for couple whose love never died
Goldwater led to Reagan Revolution; What might Ron Paul’s legacy be?
Friday nights still take me back to sidelines of high school football
My father’s embezzling started and ended my media company