What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

Going back to fundamentals gets me closer to the quality I want
Goodbye, Lucy (2012?-2025)
Check out Aya Katz’s interview with me about art and culture
Will Honduras establish the first modern free city? It’s possible
Will I run for office? The short answer is ‘no’; the longer answer is ‘no way’
Tribal instincts cause us to see others as evil, when they’re just different
Be afraid, friends: Chicken Little says the sky is falling somewhere
What if I hadn’t been afraid to follow Paul Finebaum’s advice 20 years ago?
With changed priorities, it’s time to re-evaluate my long-term goal