Ronald Reagan supposedly gave some advice to George Bush in 1988 when Bush was gearing up to run for the presidency. I can’t find the exact quote, but it was something like this: “Unless you’re the incumbent, always run on change. People always want change.”
Politicians can promise change every single election and never have to modify their basic message. Why? Because nothing substantially changes. Especially in the U.S. system, positive change is very difficult, because the system is designed to slow change down.
Even when there is change, you’ll always find it tending — over the long term — to be in the direction of government taking more and more power. For those who would like to roll back the power of government — libertarians and some conservatives — that’s a problem. (It’s actually a problem for left liberals at times, too, at least the ones who want more individual rights in some social areas.)
The weight of the evidence suggests that voting doesn’t produce change very often — and it never seems to produce change that actually reduces the size of government. Yet for some reason, some libertarians and all conservatives seem bound and determined that if they will just find a way to win this election — for whatever pathetic statist the Republicans have nominated — things are going to be different this time.
What if ‘the Good Old Days’ were never as good as you remember?
What makes someone want you enough to make you a priority?
I have new book coming about living well in a broken culture
If you aren’t free to to be a bigot if you choose, you’re not really free
Steve Jobs goes out as iconoclastic visionary many of us long to be
When did someone decide we have the legal right not to be offended?

What kind of person are you if there’s not a word to define you?
Can a free society tolerate intrusions into details of ‘The Lives of Others’?