You might not know Matthew Lesko‘s name, but there’s a good chance you’ve seen or heard one of his ads. He claims to have been researching government grants for more than two decades and he claims to be the expert on “free money for everybody.”
I’ve always found his ads offensive, because there’s something horribly distasteful to me in the idea of “free money.” There’s no such thing as free money. There’s only money that’s been taken from one group of people and given to another group of people — and that’s always seemed very wrong to me.
But I’ve been thinking lately about this issue, and I’m not sure the case is as simple as I’d like it to be. It’s not that I’ve suddenly started approving of governments coercively taking money from people. But the question of what it’s OK for us to accept from government is more complicated — at least for those of us who believe it’s wrong for the money to be available in the first place.
I know a couple who are having a difficult time financially right now. She’s working full-time while he finishes his college degree. They have a young child, and it’s a struggle to make it financially. But he’s a libertarian who hasn’t been willing to take any government assistance. His in-laws watch them struggle and seem disapproving that he won’t apply for any kind of government aid. Is he a principled man who we should admire? Or is he a fool for not taking the help that’s available?

We live in Reverse World, where black is white and good is evil
Just underneath a civilized veneer, savage conqueror lives in my DNA
Epiphany: Was it so bad that I used to work toward perfection?
Upcoming Romney-Obama contest says this is what Americans want
Deconstructing my old life’s hard, but I’m learning to be healthier
I’m a liar — and you are, too; most of all, we lie to ourselves
Don’t personalize: The system is the issue, not Obama or any individual
Shouldn’t you believe everything you see posted on social media?
I want to live a life my kids will want to emulate as they grow up