I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

Lucy’s fun afternoon at my office reminds me that work needs play
Warning: Don’t trust in politicians; they’re always going to disappoint
If politics sends you into a rage, is it really a good use of your time?
When will you admit that a constitution can’t control state?
Conflict pushes inner buttons to make me feel like child in trouble
When people show you who they are, trust their actions, not words
Old photos have me thinking about who I was then, how far I’ve come
Science or bias? What if there’s no proof that eating fat will kill you?
Without motivation, dreams fade,