There was a time — not so long ago — when Americans at least pretended to care deeply about character. We argued about politics, yes, but we also insisted that the people entrusted with power possess some basic moral grounding.
Honesty mattered. Decency mattered. The idea that private conduct revealed public truth was widely understood.
Somewhere along the way, that expectation collapsed.
What replaced it was not a better philosophy or deeper compassion. It was tribalism. We began to judge leaders less by who they were and more by which side they claimed to serve. If they fought for our preferred policies, many of us decided their personal conduct was irrelevant, exaggerated or maliciously invented by opponents. Character became negotiable. Loyalty did not.
The continuing public reckoning surrounding Jeffrey Epstein is not, at its core, a political story. That is precisely why it is so revealing. Epstein moved easily among the wealthy and powerful for years. He was not an obscure figure. He was a convicted sex offender with a reputation that, at minimum, raised profound questions about his moral fitness for decent society.
Yet he was welcomed with open arms — by other men and women of equally low character.

For governance, ‘one size fits all’ is a bad idea — even if the ‘one size’ is your version of freedom
Goodbye, Dagny (2004-2019)
If you have a good enough reason, you’ll leave your addiction behind
NOTEBOOK: Simplistic storytelling on TV news pushing nation to war
Healthy partner will always ask, ‘Who do you really want to be?’
Why let your enemy control you by choosing to listen to his hate?
Are you ready for chaos when fed shutdown turns your gravity off?
Why do we ‘need’ the newest thing? Is that where people get their joy?