There’s something wrong with the “justice” system when a jury convicts a man of a crime, but sends a note to the judge saying, “We’ve all reached a verdict. To us we feel he has been wronged. Please consider that in his sentencing.”
In other words, the jury felt that the accused was actually the victim in the case, but they still did what the judge and prosecutor told them to do. That’s wrong. (They’ve probably never heard of jury nullification, because judges work pretty hard to make sure jurors aren’t aware of their real rights and responsibilities.)
A Texas jury convicted a man of resisting arrest after police mistook him for a burglar and broke into his home — and he tried to escape from them. Police say a neighbor reported — wrongly — seeing a black male kicking in a door to the house. For some odd reason, this Hispanic man apparently didn’t trust that police who had just broken into his own home had his best interests at heart.
The man’s attorney says his client has the mind of a child and also struggles with the English/Spanish language barrier, but I’d say the guy showed good judgement in resisting the people who were breaking in and trying to grab him, whether they were dressed in police costumes or not.
Our life choices dictate who will be there when it’s our time to die
Intellectual honesty mostly dead — but few partisans even care
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Sam, the baby kitten I stole
Eviction leaves me sifting through collateral damage of a broken life
‘Let’s Make a Deal’: Democracy is like a dumb old TV game show
Inner peace requires breaking free of your defense mechanisms
Spending all of life in politics leaves many out of touch with real people
Be very afraid of men (or women) who question your patriotism
Is Paul Krugman serious or is this some kind of weird performance art?