Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

What if all truth and all beauty can be traced back to one source?
Financially struggling woman jailed over unpaid fine for junky yard
X-ray scanners used by TSA banned in Europe over health concerns
What are you likely to regret when it’s too late to change?
Just give us fake, happy smiles; who wants to hear your feelings?
I can’t find the balance between expecting too much and too little