I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

You must walk away from past before you open door to future
Do people change? Or do we just learn how to manage our faults?
Rand Paul shows you can fight the system or join it — but not both
After chimp’s mother died, mama dog raised baby as one of her pups
Hidden chains need to be broken, so I’ve become a reluctant rebel
How much of what we do is driven by our unconscious social scripts?
Money can’t buy happiness, but poverty can make you miserable
Starved for love: Portrait of a plastic person living a little plastic life