The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

In a culture that worships youth, we’re scared to look in a mirror
Little blonde cousins are sometimes perfect antidote for life’s bleak days
If president can just ignore laws, what’s the purpose of having laws?
My fears are less about death than about my own ‘unlived’ life
Not satire this time: In New Zealand, one model cries discrimination
Self-compassion is difficult when harsh inner judge condemns you
Is it persistence or stubbornness to keep chasing uncertain outcomes?
Which side should we take in Syria? Let’s just mind our own business
Wall Street protester accidentally illustrates power of voluntary action