I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

FRIDAY FUNNIES
Storms can end without warning, bringing hope of blue skies ahead
Do great dreams really come true or do they just serve to haunt us?
16-year-old charged with felony for science experiment gone bad
We can’t defeat the existing system; we must build a better one instead
Counting on the status quo? Do you have a plan in case things collapse?
Creators must be wary of making propaganda or work for own ego
A question I’m scared to answer: Why haven’t I made another film?
How does modern culture escape ‘little boxes made of ticky tacky’?