I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Children’s joy and innocence pierce my heart, bring me hope
U.S. debt per capita worse than basket cases such as Greece
NOTEBOOK: Why do so many libertarians need One True Way?
Baby girl murdered by own father is reminder to stay away from abusers
Predictions of doom keep failing, so isn’t it rational to doubt them?
City rushes to demolish $4.5 million transit station after only 13 years
Super Suckers: Indy taxpayers take bath in red ink to build stadium
I’m horrified that it’s become so difficult for me to finish a book