I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Years later, I see that I was an outsider who could never fit in
Listen as Aya Katz interviews me live about my close furry friends
Separating religion, spirituality makes it harder to find the Truth
Faith is our only assurance that rebirth will come again in spring
Years later, Supreme Court justice apologizes to Susette Kelo, sorta
What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?
Cancer unexpectedly took Lucy before old age could finish her
If you accept that you’re a fool, being wrong is a lot less scary
Why are killing, maiming people elsewhere called moral, ‘legal’?