I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Honesty, wisdom and insight teach that we have to live with uncertainty
We’re slowly losing our religion, but we manage to find new gods
Can you spot the change in this video? Most can’t — and most don’t notice the world changing, either
Did GOP and Democrats get their scripts mixed up this time?
Her cat’s presence brings comfort to grandmother dying in hospital
EU Nanny State bans young kids from evil balloons and whistles
I want to help out of pure love, but human motives are messy
GAME: Can you find names of the last 20 commenters on this site?