Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Rush Limbaugh is just as partisan and ignorant as MSNBC’s Ed Schultz
If ‘bigots’ can lose their rights, will your rights be next to go?
Cancer unexpectedly took Lucy before old age could finish her
My father’s embezzling started and ended my media company
My father’s death was proof that unhappiness quickly kills a man
We already know what’s right, but we choose our lusts instead
If you aren’t free to to be a bigot if you choose, you’re not really free