Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Why do we ‘need’ the newest thing? Is that where people get their joy?
Wait, was she flirting with me? My history shows I’m clueless
Obama’s plan to ‘tax the rich’ is simply class warfare — and politics
How to exploit school kids to get elected to almost any office
We’ve welcomed visitors from 57 countries and 48 U.S. states so far
Unhappiness can’t hide forever when life has gone very wrong
Doing it for the children? No, they’re doing it for the TV cameras
The time is rapidly coming when I’m quitting Facebook for good