If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Reality check: A stupid racial prank isn’t ‘the worst thing anybody can do’
No ebooks for me: Reading is about more than simply absorbing data
World has become a freak show, but we’re not supposed to notice
That huge fed debt increase? They’ve already used 60 percent of it
A reminder to friends of liberty: Others don’t understand our beliefs
‘War is the health of the state’ — but the death of the people who serve it
Laughing at the ‘rapture cult’? Those who believe in the state are no different
Powerful emotions come and go, so it’s worth noting if one stays