If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Trump’s rabid defenders selling their souls for a narcissistic liar
Face the facts: U.S. Constitution is dead document with no meaning
Christmas tree ‘promotion fee’ is just another hidden tax on consumers
We sometimes need help to finish a long race we’ve decided to run
Competent, beautiful girl mirrors what I’d love to have in daughter
Try a new game: Make others smile — and let yourself smile with them
What will you do when ‘electing the right people’ doesn’t change things?
It’s time to change my story and reinvent myself — one more time