I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Experimentation produces beauty that won’t come from slavishly following One True Way
How can a child process seeing his mother trying to stab father?
Loss of cultural consensus means violent conflict in decades ahead
Pursuing conscious life is harder than sleepwalking through a life
Don’t personalize: The system is the issue, not Obama or any individual
What kind of person are you if there’s not a word to define you?
Ayn Rand spins in her grave? ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is a bad film
Will I run for office? The short answer is ‘no’; the longer answer is ‘no way’