Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

If Boston bombing suspect doesn’t have rights, neither do the rest of us
Three of Colorado shooting victims died protecting their girlfriends
Most of nature follows instinct, but humans often ignore voice
My need to make others perfect reflects my fear I’m not in control
What dark magic will it take to get Obama re-elected? Merlin knows
How can we be lonely while we’re surrounded by billions of people?
Even when folks praise my work, my secret fear is I may be a fraud
Global warming or a new ice age? Anyone who claims to know is lying